Logo

Cassandra vs DynamoDB - Which NoSQL database is better for big data apps?

August 02, 2022

Cassandra vs DynamoDB - Which NoSQL database is better for big data apps?

As a developer, choosing the right database for your big data app can be a daunting task. With so many NoSQL databases to choose from, it's hard to determine which one will meet your specific requirements. In this article, we'll compare two of the most popular NoSQL databases for big data - Cassandra and DynamoDB.

What are Cassandra and DynamoDB?

Cassandra and DynamoDB are two fully managed cloud-based NoSQL databases. Both are designed to handle large amounts of data and are highly scalable.

Cassandra is an open-source distributed database that was initially developed by Facebook. It was later donated to the Apache Software Foundation and is now maintained by them.

DynamoDB, on the other hand, is a fully managed NoSQL database service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It is a proprietary solution and is based on the Amazon Dynamo paper, published in 2007.

Data Structure

Cassandra and DynamoDB both use a key-value data structure. However, Cassandra allows for more complex data structures, including lists, maps, and sets. DynamoDB, on the other hand, is limited to key-value pairs only.

Cassandra also allows for nested structures and secondary indexes, while DynamoDB only allows for a limited form of secondary indexes.

Scalability

Both Cassandra and DynamoDB are designed to be highly scalable. They can be used to build applications that can handle massive amounts of data and traffic.

However, DynamoDB's scaling is more straightforward, and it can handle spikes in traffic more efficiently. Cassandra, on the other hand, requires more management effort in scaling and is better suited for applications that are more predictable in terms of traffic and growth.

Performance

Both databases perform well, and their performance can be further optimized by tuning the various configuration parameters.

In general, Cassandra performs better on write-heavy workloads, while DynamoDB performs better on read-heavy workloads. Cassandra's performance can also be improved by using a partitioning strategy that evenly distributes data across nodes.

Cost

DynamoDB pricing is based on a pay-per-use model, and you only pay for the resources you consume. Cassandra can be open-source or deployed on various cloud services. The cost varies in terms of support, maintenance, and other factors.

Conclusion

Both Cassandra and DynamoDB are excellent choices for big data applications. The choice between the two depends on your specific use case and requirements.

If you need more flexibility in data modeling and secondary indexes, Cassandra may be a better fit. On the other hand, if you need a more straightforward and easy-to-manage database, DynamoDB may be a better option.

Regardless of what you choose, you can be sure that both databases will perform well and scale to meet your needs.

References:

© 2023 Flare Compare